Web api timeout
Each command in WebdriverIO is an asynchronous operation. A request is fired to the Selenium server or a cloud service like Sauce Labsand its response contains the result once the action has completed or failed.
Therefore, time is a crucial component in the whole testing process. When a certain action depends on the state of a different action, you need to make sure that they get executed in the right order. Timeouts play an important role when dealing with these issues.
A session has an associated session script timeout that specifies a time to wait for asynchronous scripts to run. Unless stated otherwise, it is 30 seconds. You can set this timeout like so:. A session has an associated session page load timeout that specifies a time to wait for the page loading to complete.
Session Management In ASP.NET Web API
Unless stated otherwise, it ismilliseconds. The pageLoad keyword is a part of the official WebDriver specificationbut might not be supported for your browser the previous name is page load.
A session has an associated session implicit wait timeout. Unless stated otherwise, it is 0 milliseconds. WebdriverIO provides multiple commands to wait on elements to reach a certain state e. These commands take a selector argument and a timeout number, which determines how long the instance should wait for that element to reach the state. Note the lowercase f! It ensures that the test process doesn't get stuck if something goes wrong. By default, the timeout is 10 seconds, which means that a single test should not take longer than that.
In Cucumber, the timeout applies to a single step definition. However, if you want to increase the timeout because your test takes longer than the default value, you need to set it in the framework options. Selenium timeouts Session Script Timeout A session has an associated session script timeout that specifies a time to wait for asynchronous scripts to run. You can set this timeout like so: browser.
Session Implicit Wait Timeout A session has an associated session implicit wait timeout.
By default, at the bottom of the ECS, we have a global execution context which deals with all the code in the global scope. Each function has its own execution context called functional execution context which gets inserted on the top of ECS as and when the function is called in the code.
NET framework. Specialises in problem identification and proposal of alternative solutions. Provided knowledge and individual mentoring to team members as needed. NET technology. November 13, October 15, July 19, Greate pieces.
Keep posting such kind of info on your site. Im really impressed by your site. Hi there, You have done a fantastic job. I will definitely digg it and in my opinion suggest to my friends. Your email address will not be published. Notify me of follow-up comments by email. Notify me of new posts by email. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Email Address. How to increase timeout for your ASP.
NET Application? Kapil Khandelwal. How to use jQuery plugins with conflicting names on the same page in ASP. NET web application November 13, Replacing Backbone.
How to increase timeout for your ASP.NET Application ?
I'm inclined to 2. For the same reason, I'm not sure why 10 minutes and not 9 or That said, I am curious as to whether there are any sort of security loopholes that can utilize 2. This depends on what should be achieved with the timeout. You might timeout a session if the user did not interact with the site for some time. Or you might timeout the session if the user has not visited the site for some time, but don't timeout if the site is still open inside the browser.
The first way is more secure but the second is more comfortable for the user longer timeouts are more comfortable too. How to weight security vs. If the session timeout should be triggered based on actual user activity then it should be reset only if such activity is found, i.
If the session timeout should instead be based on browser activity i. Such successful exchange means that the web site is still open inside the browser and the the browser has network connection but it does not mean that the user is actually doing something with the site i.
Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Home Questions Tags Users Unanswered.
Definition of Idle Timeout Ask Question. Asked 2 years, 4 months ago. Active 2 years, 2 months ago. Viewed 2k times. Should I run the session idle timeout timer From the start of the first request to the start of the next request, or From the end of the first request to the start of the next request?
Note - I also have an absolute timeout running from the start of the session. My apologies if this is supposed to be in another stackexchange site if at all.If a WebAPI service takes a long time to complete, the caller, the client side, may timeout waiting for a response.
There are several options to solve this issue, you can increase the timeout limit on the client side and web server side, or use a more persistent connection method like WebSocket and SignalR. It can simply calls back every 5 seconds to check the result of the processing.
Here I am going to provide some sample code on how to achieve this. First, we create a Task class. We chose an approach that enables client side to check the result actively.
Although it makes the client side a bit more complex, it is a reliable way to handle WebAPI calls that run a long time and also provides much more flexibility to the client side. There might be infrequent problems due to app pool recycling. Like when you start a task before a recycle and check the status afterwards.
So I propose that you store TaskID and other state in persistent storage, like sql server. Also add a timestamp for when the task is started. Then in each CheckStatus call you check the status and report it back. If the timestamp is too old you modify the status to timed out. You will have to handle state in the task as well.
Like what to do when you have completed the task and the task is already recorded as being timed out. You are commenting using your WordPress. You are commenting using your Google account. You are commenting using your Twitter account. You are commenting using your Facebook account. Notify me of new comments via email. Notify me of new posts via email. March 5, March 5, ToString ; Execute ; task. Processing thread.
Share this: Twitter Facebook. Like this: Like Loading Design error message. Leave a Reply Cancel reply Enter your comment here Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:.We use Skybox with our Checkpoint environment but we face an issue in R There is no difference in the log file api. The timeout you are experiencing is not controllable via the API login parameters. The timeout, at seconds you are running into is an apache default configuration.
That if any POST command is received and data is not transferred over this connection for seconds, apache will close this connection.
We do not recommend modifying this timeout as it effects several services. I would go the route phone boy is recommending, and try to understand why in the world a show route or similar command would take 5 minutes. If you are querying hundreds of devices at a time, with run script targets. You might reduce to only a handful of devices at a time.
As run-script will not pass any data over the API command until all scripts report there status. View solution in original post. I think I find why we issue a timeout. The problem is that Cluster object do not respond to the request and then it took some time before CKPT put this task in error. I confirm it with two tests: - With all the target the task is complete in 18 mn en 14 sec - With only the cluster member in the target part the task end in 4 mn 37 sec.
The dark mode beta is finally here. Change your preferences any time. Stack Overflow for Teams is a private, secure spot for you and your coworkers to find and share information. NET pipeline, meaning execution timeout is unsupported.
So how do I timeout a request in WebApi? Building on the suggestion by Mendhak, it is possible to do what you want, though not exactly the way you'd like to do it without jumping through quite a few hoops.
Doing it without a filter might look something like this:. Here you will receive a timeout because the actual "work" we're doing will take longer than the timeout.
To do what you want with an attribute is possible, though not ideal. It's the same basic idea as before, but the filter could actually be used to execute the action via reflection.
I don't think I would recommend this route, but in this contrived example, you can see how it might be done:. This works for simple types e. Using custom types with this exact code will be a bit problematic as far as serialization goes, but with some work, this could probably be useful in some specific scenarios. That the action parameters come in the form of a dictionary instead of an array could also pose some issues in terms of the parameter ordering.
Obviously having real support for this would be better. If they do, it will likely not be through the System. AsyncTimeoutAttribute class, as they are explicitly removing dependencies on System. As of today, it doesn't appear that adding a System.
Mvc entry to the project. If it does, while you wouldn't be able to use the new cloud-optimized framework with such code, you might be able to use the AsyncTimeout attribute on code that is only intended to run with the full. NET framework. For what it's worth, this is what I tried adding to project. Perhaps a specific version would have made it happier? A reference to it does show up in the Solution Explorer's references list, but it does so with a yellow exclamation point indicating a problem.
The application itself returns errors while this reference remains. With WebAPI, you would generally handle timeouts on the client side, rather than the server side. This is because, and I quote :. The reason being that multiple requests can reuse TCP connections within a single HttpClient and so you can't safely cancel a single request without possibly affecting other requests as well. You can control the timeout for requests -- I think it's on the HttpClientHandler if I recall correctly. If you really need to implement a timeout on the API side itself, I would recommend creating a thread to do your work in, and then cancelling it after a certain period.
You could for example put it in a Taskcreate your 'timeout' task using Task. Wait and use Task. WaitAny for the first one to come back.